4 Comments

  1. José Ramón

    One very democratic difference between the electoral process in the West™ is the “first down” letting a random selection of citizens screen the candidates. In many other countries the candidates are screened by the upper levels of the political parties. Zero input from regular people, the people have to vote for those chosen by the party. In this system the people can reject whoever they wish.

    I am curious about the modern workplace environment in China. We in the West™ are very in the dark about Chinese workplace culture. I have sympathy towards instituting meaningful workplace democracy, however your posts about the differences between thw more French workplace culture in French speaking Belgium and the Flemish workplace culture highlights what can happen in dysfunctional attempts to institute workplace democracy. I wonder what methods the Chinese have instituted, whatever methods they are, they seem to be working quite well.

    • Avatar photo Frans Vandenbosch

      Hello José Ramón
      Yes, indeed, the Chinese election system is much more democratic than our western elections.
      As for the workplace environment and relations between the workers and top management, I can testify about those conditions, based on my years of experience in Chinese companies in Shanghai, Pudong, Songjiang, Suzhou and Wuxi.
      Labor relations and relations are often better, more harmonious, than in Western Europe. This may be due to the much greater sense of responsibility of company management for the well-being of the workers and for Chinese society in general. Chinese companies are embedded in society; they are not money creators; they have a different vision of society than Western companies.
      But despite all this, when Chinese workers are still mistreated, they are much more likely to take to the streets for demonstrations than workers in the West.

  2. Nathan B

    Thanks for the informative article!
    I think it is interesting that voters can explicitly vote for or against candidates, it reminds me of the like / dislike button on YouTube, where the public counts for dislikes are removed. Are the full for / against numbers made public after the election as well? It would be interesting to try and institute this in the US and have the results be public.
    I also thought it was cool that most of the local candidates are from independent parties, it seems in the US unfortunately the 2 main parties are the only “viable” options, even at more local levels

    • Avatar photo Frans Vandenbosch

      Yes, of course, all the full for / against numbers are made public after the election. There is absolute transparency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *